You don't have to understand refs and branches and commit hashes to view what files changed in a commit. To find the cause of the error faster, you can ignore the parts of a file that didn't change and review just the new code. This is an invaluable overview when you've introduced a bug during a sprint. The patches are also a good way to summarize the important parts of what new information a specific commit introduces. These patches can be used with common Unix utilities like diff and patch, should you need to make the same changes manually elsewhere. +++ -1,2 +1,2 this example, the one-word line "world" was removed from hello.txt and the new line "" was added. Your Git log can produce an inline diff, a line-by-line display of all changes for each file, with the -patch option: commit 62a2daf8411eccbec0af69e4736a0fcf0a469ab1 (HEAD -> master) Not only can you see which files changed, but you can also make git log display exactly what changed in the files. If you don't need to merge commits in your log (and you probably don't, if you're only looking to see files that changed), try git whatchanged as an easy mnemonic. However, I still find it a useful shortcut to (mostly) the same output (although merge commits are excluded), and I anticipate creating an alias for it should it ever be removed. Its documentation says you're not meant to use it in favor of git log -raw and implies it's essentially deprecated. The git whatchanged command is a legacy command that predates the log function. This tells you exactly which file was added to the commit and how the file was changed ( A for added, M for modified, R for renamed, and D for deleted). Here's the output of git log -raw: $ git log -raw Here's the output of a standard git log: $ git logĬommit fbbbe083aed75b24f2c77b1825ecab10def0953c (HEAD -> dev, origin/dev)Ĭommit 094f9948cd995acfc331a6965032ea0d38e01f03 (origin/master, master)Ĭommit 76b7b46dc53ec13316abb49cc7b37914215acd47Įven when the author helpfully specifies in the commit message which files changed, the log is fairly terse.
Git tag old commit plus#
The log mechanism in Git is surprisingly flexible, though, and the -raw option provides a log of commits in your current branch, plus a list of each file that had changes made to it. The git log command is underutilized in general, largely because it has so many formatting options, and many users get overwhelmed by too many choices and, in some cases, unclear documentation. It's the fastest and simplest way to get insight into which files a commit affects. if it exists and fallback to committer.To find out which files changed in a given commit, use the git log -raw command. Use creatordate, creatorname, and creatoremail instead of the tagger.
# add a new paragraph to the existing message Usage: # opens editor to edit existing message These aliases accept a single tag name and any other flags to git tag and can be modified to support name changes pretty easily as well. To illustrate this, consider the following: > git tag tag1 tag1 -f -a # accepted answer Their answers will create a new tag object that references the old tag object and both are going to have the same name. This is an improvement over Andy and Eric Hu's answers. You can do this by deleting your tag and recreating it while spoofing the date and author: > git tag -d īuilding on Sungram's answer (originally proposed as an edit): 1.
0 kommentar(er)
